I’ve talked in the past about trailing ideologies – namely that we design systems to serve an era, but when the era changes, the systems often don’t. Education is a great example. In higher education and corporate training, we labour under many assumptions and ideologies that have been negated by the web, social media, and mobile technologies. Courses, classrooms, and teacher-centric learning can (should) be rethought to capitalize on what technology enables and renders obsolete from the previous model.
So what role is left for the teacher? To be effective, Wieman says, they must be “cognitive coaches” rather than conduits of information. Rankin believes that the change in pedagogy will happen soon. “It’s comparable to the introduction of a light switch,” he adds. “It’s just going to take a while for people to figure out what this looks like and how it works.”
One Comment
How about the student as cognitive apprentice. I would agree that pedagogy should change, especially undergraduate.
– Decoding the Disciplines might qualify as a new pedagogical form. (available at http://www.iub.edu/~tchsotl/part3/Decoding%20Middendorf.pdf ) Although I’m hesitant at advocating anything that reinforces siloed thinking.
– I still fondly remember the graduate seminar form, which is also how I would classify CCK classes.
Post a Comment