<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/01/13/google-and-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/01/13/google-and-china/</link>
	<description>learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Feb 2012 22:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/01/13/google-and-china/comment-page-1/#comment-34416</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4551#comment-34416</guid>
		<description>I agree.  There&#039;s almost always more to the story, and I don&#039;t care much whether Google&#039;s decision is moral, ethical, or financial in nature.  Even if Google *did* decide to pull out of China out of cocnerns for its bottom line, the policy reversal can still be a step toward a more open China.  And at the very least, it points to how censorship can hinder not only free communication, but also free enterprise.

In the meantime, I think I take an approach similar to yours: with caution, and without any lofty expectations.  Words like &quot;small&quot; and &quot;potential&quot; will describe this until we see the actual results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  There&#8217;s almost always more to the story, and I don&#8217;t care much whether Google&#8217;s decision is moral, ethical, or financial in nature.  Even if Google *did* decide to pull out of China out of cocnerns for its bottom line, the policy reversal can still be a step toward a more open China.  And at the very least, it points to how censorship can hinder not only free communication, but also free enterprise.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I think I take an approach similar to yours: with caution, and without any lofty expectations.  Words like &#8220;small&#8221; and &#8220;potential&#8221; will describe this until we see the actual results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

