<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/</link>
	<description>learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Feb 2012 22:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken long</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24867</link>
		<dc:creator>ken long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4302#comment-24867</guid>
		<description>aren&#039;t there are generational patterns in he preferred methods of technological adaptation? i see kids much more comfortable using text than my generation&#039;s use of email. the use of social network software is pretty strongly correlated with age in my college and in Army units across the board, for example. It&#039;s not absurd to think that generations might have preferences for the tools they have become accustomed to. Certainly work spaces and work processes will organize around media and methods which will be a forcing function for people to use them regardless of their preference.
the article is from a futurist giving her vanilla schtick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aren&#8217;t there are generational patterns in he preferred methods of technological adaptation? i see kids much more comfortable using text than my generation&#8217;s use of email. the use of social network software is pretty strongly correlated with age in my college and in Army units across the board, for example. It&#8217;s not absurd to think that generations might have preferences for the tools they have become accustomed to. Certainly work spaces and work processes will organize around media and methods which will be a forcing function for people to use them regardless of their preference.<br />
the article is from a futurist giving her vanilla schtick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bullen</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4302#comment-24847</guid>
		<description>More of the same superficial &quot;generational analysis&quot;. It also pushes the worn out  clichés about the &quot;knowledge economy&quot;. On that, I urge people to read chapter 8 in Norm Friesen&#039;s &quot;Rethinking E-learning Research&quot; and particularly the section, &quot;The Myth of the Knowledge Economy&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the same superficial &#8220;generational analysis&#8221;. It also pushes the worn out  clichés about the &#8220;knowledge economy&#8221;. On that, I urge people to read chapter 8 in Norm Friesen&#8217;s &#8220;Rethinking E-learning Research&#8221; and particularly the section, &#8220;The Myth of the Knowledge Economy&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4302#comment-24843</guid>
		<description>I agree with @Stephen, though I would add that perhaps not for Britannica&#039;s lack of trying. The sheer volume of posts actually pushes some interesting topics to the surface, though not with the sort of frequency that keeps them in my feed reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @Stephen, though I would add that perhaps not for Britannica&#8217;s lack of trying. The sheer volume of posts actually pushes some interesting topics to the surface, though not with the sort of frequency that keeps them in my feed reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/09/17/the-future-of-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24838</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4302#comment-24838</guid>
		<description>George, I think Britannica has been sloppy - very sloppy - with their posts for some time now. If we went back through them we would find a litany of very poor articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, I think Britannica has been sloppy &#8211; very sloppy &#8211; with their posts for some time now. If we went back through them we would find a litany of very poor articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

