<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Developing an Enterprise Social Computing Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/08/06/developing-an-enterprise-social-computing-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/08/06/developing-an-enterprise-social-computing-strategy/</link>
	<description>learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Feb 2012 22:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/08/06/developing-an-enterprise-social-computing-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-22138</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4195#comment-22138</guid>
		<description>Very interesting - totally agree with corporate technology point. I wonder how they made the decision about balancing openness and lockdown. I appreciate that Intel did their PoCs etc but if you don&#039;t have a collaborative environment in the first place for people to connect and talk about these kinds of issues before making the decision... and yet decision makers seem happy to make a significant investment into developing platforms. I don&#039;t know if this means it is essentially flawed or whether this is a corporate reaction to openness - phase which will bring about a better longer term change - will be interesting to see what Intel and others think in a couple of years time I guess.

I think I disagree at the moment about app stores, but what do I know, I have yet to submit anything to one - still, I&#039;m not sure that they bring about collaborative development and innovation that they are always talking about - they cluster some developers and naturally they no longer have the time to talk with other developers as freely - too much focus on other things, especially developers who have had their applications rejected a number of times by an app store due to some triviality. I don&#039;t think Linux would ever have appeared if there had been an app store equivalent in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting &#8211; totally agree with corporate technology point. I wonder how they made the decision about balancing openness and lockdown. I appreciate that Intel did their PoCs etc but if you don&#8217;t have a collaborative environment in the first place for people to connect and talk about these kinds of issues before making the decision&#8230; and yet decision makers seem happy to make a significant investment into developing platforms. I don&#8217;t know if this means it is essentially flawed or whether this is a corporate reaction to openness &#8211; phase which will bring about a better longer term change &#8211; will be interesting to see what Intel and others think in a couple of years time I guess.</p>
<p>I think I disagree at the moment about app stores, but what do I know, I have yet to submit anything to one &#8211; still, I&#8217;m not sure that they bring about collaborative development and innovation that they are always talking about &#8211; they cluster some developers and naturally they no longer have the time to talk with other developers as freely &#8211; too much focus on other things, especially developers who have had their applications rejected a number of times by an app store due to some triviality. I don&#8217;t think Linux would ever have appeared if there had been an app store equivalent in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

