The Google and Microsoft competition is escalating: Google announces new operating system. The operating system is expected to run on netbooks shipping in 2010. Google already has Android for mobile phones, so the move to PC-based system is an obvious direct challenge to Microsoft. With the exception of Bing, over the last several years, Microsoft has come across as a bumbling, clumsy organization trying to preserve a computing world that no longer exists. Consider Live. Or Mesh. Both initiatives were an attempt to innovate, but Microsoft is too tied to existing revenue models to be creative. Google, on the other hand, is well ahead in its ability to conceive a new world of computing and interaction. The announcement of Wave is a great example – a product that attempts to re-write interaction/collaboration based on today’s technologies, not those created decades ago. Google is exploring new territory. Microsoft is trying to defend what it has.
Of course, Google is also entering new territory with the OS initiative. Microsoft has decades of experience and established relationships with businesses and hardware manufacturers. The Microsoft ecosystem is strong and entrenched. Success is far from assured for Google. Writing an OS for a netbook is a much simpler task than writing an OS that works on a broad range of PCs in numerous complex organizational settings.
Other commentary:
Redefining the OS: “The new OS will focus entirely on the web: “The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. For application developers, the web is the platform.” What that means is this. The browser is the platform. The browser is the UI.”
Google Blog: “Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010. Because we’re already talking to partners about the project, and we’ll soon be working with the open source community, we wanted to share our vision now so everyone understands what we are trying to achieve.”
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
2 Comments
“Google is also entering new territory with the OS initiative…”
Well, depends on who you ask. Some would argue Google’s already on the OS scene with GooOS. Others would argue it’s not a real OS.
Although I appreciate the jab at Microsoft, I don’t see this doing any real damage. Microsoft’s major advantage is that its system is bundled with virtually ever PC (or at least was). Most users use Windows because that’s the default or that was their default and they’re now so familiar with the framework (in the case of IT folks) that it’s just not worth changing.
On the other hand, it takes a certain level of technological knowledge to even know about netbooks, so I see netbook users being more likely to use Chrome.
You can see some of the mainstream response to the announcement at http://www.newsy.com/videos/google_gears_up_for_os.
Hi Daniel – I did note at the end of my post that OS for more advanced computers are a greater challenge than simply creating a netbook OS.
It’s too early to tell how this will impact MS dominance. The somewhat steady decline of Internet Explorer shows MS is unable to innovate rapidly enough to compete with open source innovations. Or, if they are able to innovate, they have misjudged the market.
But, even then, MS is dominant on desktops…and even more so on netbooks. They do look more vulnerable now (after a decade of open source innovation, Google products, and Apple products) than they did in early 2000.
Post a Comment