<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/06/29/evaluation-of-evidence-based-practices-in-online-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/06/29/evaluation-of-evidence-based-practices-in-online-learning/</link>
	<description>learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Feb 2012 22:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewout ter Haar</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/06/29/evaluation-of-evidence-based-practices-in-online-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-18589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewout ter Haar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=4105#comment-18589</guid>
		<description>Actually, they were forced to consider mostly older learners, since &quot;Few rigorous research studies of the effectiveness of online learning for K–12 students have been published.&quot;

Reading the report, and maybe because not being used to this kind of research, I was struck by the smallness of the measured effect sizes: 0.24, 0.38, those kind of values. See (http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1297 for the meaning of &quot;effect sizes&quot;). 

No evidence for disruptive effects here (but maybe this kind of research is not capable of finding real big changes, since this kind of research, by design, compares very similar situations)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, they were forced to consider mostly older learners, since &#8220;Few rigorous research studies of the effectiveness of online learning for K–12 students have been published.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reading the report, and maybe because not being used to this kind of research, I was struck by the smallness of the measured effect sizes: 0.24, 0.38, those kind of values. See (<a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1297" rel="nofollow">http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1297</a> for the meaning of &#8220;effect sizes&#8221;). </p>
<p>No evidence for disruptive effects here (but maybe this kind of research is not capable of finding real big changes, since this kind of research, by design, compares very similar situations)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

