General Motors is now the new standard insult to organizations that need to innovate, but don’t. Established institutions like higher education are increasingly targeted as bloated, inefficient, and “thoroughly corrupt”. Harsh. Ivory Tower: Crumbling from Within quotes a presentation by Jeff Sandefer (who is highly biased as the founder of an business school to counter traditional universities): “the bureaucratic “pedagogy of arrogance” may soon collapse, much like the General Motors and even the former Soviet Union” (insert joke here about how effective business schools were at preventing economic collapse in late 2008). We then hear of David Wiley (slightly misquoted) declaring universities will be irrelevant by 2020. Each era of history creates its knowledge institutions to reflect how information (in that era) is created, disseminated, shared, and re-created. History has given us libraries, monasteries, universities, and research labs. What does the future hold for knowledge institutions when the information cycle is under the control of individuals and amateurs? I don’t agree fully with the harsh assessment in the articles linked above – universities appear to be awakening to the changed reality – but our current challenge is that we have no alternative to move toward. We know what we don’t want universities to be. We don’t yet have thought leadership on what they should become.
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- September 2017
- June 2017
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
2 Comments
George, I wrote a reply to the same topic over at the LearningTown.ning.com site. I’ve placed a slightly edited version here for your post.
I agree with your call for the thought leaders to step-up and define what they should become. Making this type of disruption happen will take some strong individuals though. The incumbents are entrenched with money and power. They have an infrastructure that requires an ever increasing cash-flow. In addition, society has bought into the “formal learning” requirement. Change won’t be easy.
It’s a great discussion though. Thanks for making me think about it again this morning. Here’s my [edited] previous reply.
************************
Something has to change.
College is becoming prohibitively expensive for the middle class. I’ve got 2 young daughters and the projections for their education are ridiculous. Costs are outpacing inflation by a wide margin and lets face it, the economic meltdown has hit institutional endowments hard. They will have to raise tuition to cover the shortfall. Are we going to be satisfied as a society if we burden our children with student loans? Can they really escape them? And, will our children really get an adequate return on investment?
I wonder if the perceived value of a college degree will change as more things move online. For example, if a teenager has written a great application and sells hundreds of thousands of copies, does she need a college degree in programming? She has proven already proven her coding abilities.
If a high school senior writes poetry on their blog, self-publishes a book, and makes a movie from their creative writing, do they really need a liberal arts degree? They’ve demonstrated their abilities more than most graduates.
I’m not saying to skip college, go straight to work, and stop your education. I’m saying, I believe real world application teaches far more than a college class. Nothing prepares you for business like trying to start one. The key will be selectively continuing your education through classes, online resources, informal learning, and application. However, there isn’t necessarily a “degree” at the end of the school of hard knocks.
Today we still see a degree as a requirement for certain jobs. I get that. However, if someone has already proven they can perform, the expense of college may not yield the return or cover the opportunity cost.
Universities may become less relevant provided kids channel their energies into building & demonstrating their skills and hiring managers realize parchment doesn’t determine motivation & abilities. Then again, I doubt these types of kids would want to go to work in a cubicle for a manager like that anyway. And when these graduates assume decision/hiring power, will they weigh institutional knowledge more than social proof?
Perhaps something really is changing.
The main problem with the university IMO is that the only things really needed for learning are the learner and teacher, and access to the information. It’s frequently unnecessary for the learner and teacher to occupy the same physical space–and when it is necessary in most cases just about any space close to a library and Internet access will probably do, unless some sort of specialized and capital-intensive lab facility is required. (cf. Franz Nahrada’s villages, with “public school” functions carried out in storefront rooms and other ad hoc spaces all over the community).
So the absolutely enormous amount of money spent on plant and equipment, enormous stone and brick buildings (and especially monumental architecture), on getting teachers and learners and information together at a centrally located site, and on the gigantic administrative bureaucracy for providing services and keeping track of them, is absolutely wasted.
It’s yet another example of the “high overhead” organizations Paul Goodman described in People or Personnel, with markups of 300 or 400% to make or do anything.
It’s about as unnecessary to assemble people at some giant, central “learning factory” as it is to do the same for physical goods. The ability to move information cheaply and easily, which provide a technical basis for Illich’s decentralized learning nets several orders of magnitude more efficient than Illich himself envisioned, makes Albert Jay Nock’s educational model of “Mark Hopkins on one end of a log and a student on the other end” more technically feasible than ever before.
2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Established institutions like higher education are targeted as bloated, inefficient, and “thoroughly corrupt”…
Ivory Tower: Crumbling from Within quotes a presentation by Jeff Sandefer (who is highly biased as the founder of an business school to counter traditional universities): “the bureaucratic “pedagogy of arrogance” may soon collapse…
[...] Rough week for higher education – a post that points to two different discussions about the problems facing universities within and without. [...]