<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information (sensemaking) tools are pathetic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/</link>
	<description>learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Feb 2012 22:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Greenway</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Greenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>George
I haven&#039;t had much time to play with it but I think that www.debategraph.com could be an interesting tool.  Effectively plugging a wiki functionality into a social network with the ability to position contradictory/complementary arguments and rate them.  Certainly could be more efficient at extracting/evolving sense than an army of paid consultants.  But it will depend on whether it is user friendly enough for people to actually use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George<br />
I haven&#8217;t had much time to play with it but I think that <a href="http://www.debategraph.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.debategraph.com</a> could be an interesting tool.  Effectively plugging a wiki functionality into a social network with the ability to position contradictory/complementary arguments and rate them.  Certainly could be more efficient at extracting/evolving sense than an army of paid consultants.  But it will depend on whether it is user friendly enough for people to actually use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Snowden</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Snowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8131</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to be certified to use SenseMaker™ just talk with Michael or me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to be certified to use SenseMaker™ just talk with Michael or me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>Is Cohere (http://cohere.open.ac.uk/) (I must confess to a vested interest, it&#039;s an OU app, but not developed by me) any good for what you have in mind?
My colleague Simon Buckingham Shum (http://cohere.open.ac.uk/) is the brains behind it and sensemaking is his thang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Cohere (<a href="http://cohere.open.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://cohere.open.ac.uk/</a>) (I must confess to a vested interest, it&#8217;s an OU app, but not developed by me) any good for what you have in mind?<br />
My colleague Simon Buckingham Shum (<a href="http://cohere.open.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://cohere.open.ac.uk/</a>) is the brains behind it and sensemaking is his thang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald H Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8103</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald H Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8103</guid>
		<description>Hi George,

To follow up from Gary, surely &#039;sensemaking&#039; is what the brain does, and any tool can only display information according to the parameters we give it. Can any tool really make sense of things for us? 

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi George,</p>
<p>To follow up from Gary, surely &#8216;sensemaking&#8217; is what the brain does, and any tool can only display information according to the parameters we give it. Can any tool really make sense of things for us? </p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8061</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8061</guid>
		<description>&quot;Where are the tools that help us to make sense of distributed (fragmented) information from multiple sources and interactions with many different people, networks, and organizations?&quot;

Can you give an example of something that you&#039;d like done that you cannot do presently?  Seems like maybe the human brain is the best tool for the task you mention above. 

It&#039;s incredibly difficult to even combine structured data from multiple sources and not shoot yourself in the foot doing it (ie, make the combined data set useless or flat-out wrong).

But maybe I&#039;m misunderstanding what you intended.

Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where are the tools that help us to make sense of distributed (fragmented) information from multiple sources and interactions with many different people, networks, and organizations?&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you give an example of something that you&#8217;d like done that you cannot do presently?  Seems like maybe the human brain is the best tool for the task you mention above. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s incredibly difficult to even combine structured data from multiple sources and not shoot yourself in the foot doing it (ie, make the combined data set useless or flat-out wrong).</p>
<p>But maybe I&#8217;m misunderstanding what you intended.</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glen</title>
		<link>http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2009/03/05/information-sensemaking-tools-are-pathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-8059</link>
		<dc:creator>glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/?p=3830#comment-8059</guid>
		<description>SenseMaker does look very interesting. 
Looks like it might be based on the same principle as the grounded theory method. GTM is a systematic process for gathering data from multiple sources, and analyzing for patterns using inductive and abductive reasoning. The process generates middle-level, working theories (aka pre-hypothesis) that then can be tested by other qualitative or quantitative approaches. 
It would be wonderful if you could convince the SenseMaker outfit to offer an online seminar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SenseMaker does look very interesting.<br />
Looks like it might be based on the same principle as the grounded theory method. GTM is a systematic process for gathering data from multiple sources, and analyzing for patterns using inductive and abductive reasoning. The process generates middle-level, working theories (aka pre-hypothesis) that then can be tested by other qualitative or quantitative approaches.<br />
It would be wonderful if you could convince the SenseMaker outfit to offer an online seminar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

