The future figured prominently in my reading this week. Janet Clarey questions the future of physical classrooms based on Elliot Masie’s question of Classrooms of the future. She asks: do we need physical classrooms for learning. While the comments to her (and Elliot’s) post range significantly, a tone of classrooms are dead is obvious. I disagree. All tools in context. Narrow, one-approach thinking brought us to where we are. Now, as “revolutionaries” sense some traction for change through the development of technology, the desire to see the future through a single lens is becoming obvious (revolutionaries seek to conserve once the revolution is finished). As trends in learning and technologies become more divergent, “and thinking” becomes more important. Classrooms and the web. Blogs and LMS. Collaborative learning and blogging.
A few additional resources: Learning technologies and schools of the future (.pdf)…and predictions for 2008 (coming in a bit late – it’s cheating if your predictions aren’t made at the end of the year or within the first few days of the new year
).
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
3 Comments
Cheating? I think if we posted predictions for 2008 in the fall of 2008 it would be cheating but not January 23. However we will try for earlier next year!
Lisa
Hi Lisa – just so you know, it was a tongue-in-cheek comment. I understand putting a list like that together requires time…
George
Schoolroom changes won’t make much difference until the textbooks take a different course. Politically correctiness, Darwinism, Al Gore and “One World Thinking” greatly restrict caring but ill-trained teachers who prepare their tedious daily lesson plans according to this crap. This is especially true in the sciences and mathematics books.
Post a Comment