Industries and fields which are largely reliant on information have been experiencing a long, slow burn which threatens to ignite into a full blaze at any moment. We see flare ups in music, movie, and other media industries. But the music/movie industries still retain much of their shape – top YouTube videos are mainstream artists like Avril Lavigne. To a certain degree, it’s the old product expressed in a new distribution channel. But journalism and news fields are different. Their product (“the paper” or “the radio talk show”) has been subject to change for over a decade. And many have moved online to varying levels. The challenge they have faced recently – and which Scott Karp alludes to briefly as being of a change-or-die nature (be sure to read the comments section – some good points made on both sides) – is with the core of journalism. Karp calls for journalism to reinvent itself. With sites like ohmynews and tools like blogs and podcasts driven by user contributions, the change to journalism may be more profound than even those who are calling for change wish to see. As stated before, I follow these media trends with an eye on their suitability as an indication of what we’ll face in education. As so many elements are unsettled (copyright, access, ownership, LMS vs. PLEs and so on), any model that serves to guide is valuable, even if it is found in the slow burn of traditional media industries.
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
One Comment
George,
I think the ‘Change or die’ comparison is an excellent one to make, but I’m not sure it is the message that will work with teachers.
I’m seeing far more connections across the globe, but I’m also sensing a backlash… a denial that things ‘need’ to change… or a refusal to recognize that the playing field is fundamentally different, thus preventing the need to change the current rules.
I connect online and see amazing things happening then I look into rooms across the hall and see the old paradigms at work.
Will things need to get worse before they get better. Are we going to see a backlash of ‘We need the 3 R’s back!’ before we see a new 3 R’s embraced?
–Reasoning: critical thinking and reflection skills
–Reconnaissance: a survey to gain information
–Responsibility: ethical and community skills
http://durffsblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/3-rs.html
‘Change or die’ may be true, but what is that path of change most needed to prevent a slow and painful death?