In an interview earlier today, I was asked what I use for social networking services. Short answer: I try them all (facebook, myspace, bebo, orkut, linkedin, twitter, etc.) and then resume the more ad hoc mixture of blogs I’ve been using for many years. Quite simply, social networking sites require a high level of commitment. It’s like taking care of a pet or a garden. If you want to keep it in good health, it requires time, effort, and work. So while facebook/twitter/ning/etc was cool for a while, I once again find myself using my aggregator (finally made the switch to Google Reader, after vowing not to give my entire digital soul to them…Bloglines just kept failing on me) to track the thinking of people I want to follow. I don’t have the patience or time to commit to a social network service. Business Week questions whether we need completely unique social networking sites: Scaling the Social Web…and explores how many websites are now offering increased user-interaction/networking. We soon end up with a network of social networks…rather than one huge over-arching network like facebook. It also results in our identity repeated each time we join a new network or social group online. Terry Anderson states that our “capacity to engage with new applications is severely limited due to the ever consuming time pressures needed to establish a presence in every new application and domain”. A central identity management service becomes critical as our profiles are used for more and more services.
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
2 Comments
Hi Siemens,
Is socialstream the “central identity management service” that you talk about? If not, what is it? Is this a software, a web service or a human behavior?
George, your comment I don’t have the patience or time to commit to a social network service. is something that many people are beginning to face. As we become overloaded with the number of networks competing for our presence, we are having to pare down and decide which one(s) will be where we stay. As for the “central management service”, the OpenId idea has merits in this manner. It would be great if more networks were to use this although I don’t think it would change the fact that time will limit one’s presence on any one network. As with you, I have tried many of them, some I’ve continued but some have fallen away because of the time factor. Do you not think that this will eventually lead to the popular networks remaining while other fade away? Or, because of our desire for the new and novel, will we always be intrigued to try something new and, if better, begin to spend our time there?
Post a Comment