At a recent conference, I was surprised at the similarity of concerns facing healthcare, financial markets, media, and education. All of these markets are experiencing the same challenge: the center isn’t holding, and the edges (i.e. networks) are forcing a restructuring in how things are done. Wired has an article (Ultimate Guide to Online Video) exploring the new reality of video: “Television was a one-way medium – big broadcasters pushing content into our living rooms at a specific time and place.
Not anymore. Online video has arrived, unleashed from the networks, cable companies, and media giants. Thanks to growing bandwidth, easy access to the means of production, and cheap storage, it’s exploding all around us and becoming a very real, very different way to experience news and entertainment.”
I’ve been saying this for years…but these trends are at the doorstep of education. We may still control certification, but the learning act itself is quickly moving into the hands of learners.
-
‹ Home
Contents
-
Categories
-
Tags
Adoption Articles Blogging Classification/Ontologies Collaboration Community Connectivism Content Content Management Copyright/IP/DRM Design Elearning Evaluation/Assessment/ROI Games/Simulations Information Architecture Innovation Instructional Design Knowledge Management Learning Learning Objects Legal LMS Media Networks Open Source Podcasting Random Thoughts Research Resources ROI Search Semantic Web SNA Social Standards Storytelling Teaching Technology Theories Tools Trends Usability Wiki Wireless/PDAs XML
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
3 Comments
What is this learning act of which you speak? Where does it happen? When does it happen? If it’s that minor epiphany, the “Ah-ha!” moment, then it has always been in the hands of the learner, has it not? Stated a bit more precisely, it has always also taken place somewhere in the individual neural network, at a moment when logic, intuition and motivation conspired to make it stand out from the scrolling matrix as something worthy of long-term storage and recall.
I teach at a community college, and am myself a product of the community college system. I took that university thing as far as it would go, too, but it was the first two years at a community college that made me a learner. And it was the teachers I encountered there that made the difference, not the content that I might, presumably, have assmilated on my own. Logic must be learned, intuition must be nurtured, and the motivation to do anything beyond preserving oneself and procreating, is a product of social interaction. We do one helluva lot more than certify! We provide connections to current subtotals of accumulated knowledge and wisdom. We provide a safe environment for testing assumptions and assertions–those of others, and our own. We introduce doubt into a world that would otherwise go without saying.
I’ve played around with the concepts of centre and periphery for more than twenty years. The relationship is archetypal and will no doubt continue to fascinate. But modern learners aren’t the downtrodden masses, yearning to learn free. Post-structuralists and other disaffected Marxists have nothing to teach us about centre and periphery in the context of learning communities.
I teach new media and Web technologies, but with just a little shift in perspective, I recognize that instant messaging is essentially gossip, and the lion’s share of blogs little more than narcissistic streams of consciousness. The mere fact that pod- and vodcasts don’t use push-technology to infiltrate our living spaces is only quantitatively different than having 200 cable channels to choose from.
These so-called “very different ways of experencing news and entertainment” are not necessarily grounds for celebration. The potential of these new technologies holds enormous promise, I’ll grant you, but there is little measurable evidence that they represent a paradigm-shift in the way students learn. We have simply hyped the future to the point where we actually think we remember it.
Can’t wait for my teacher to post his lessons on MyTube so everyone will know how insane he is
I totally agree with you George. Present and near future technologies will (hopefully) change they we teach and enhance students learning. It is frustrating trying to get some people to see the potential. I’m glad you can.