|
Online
Facilitation
Elearning
Course
October
21, 2002
The
following is a summary of "content created" as a result of Week
5 of discussions using a non-traditional approach to learning (participants
of "elearning
noncourse"). This article is best understood as a collage of
thoughts, rather than a cohesive essay.
Contributors
to the discussion: Jennifer Cowley, Sharon Chanley, Stephen Downes,
Lisa Holstrom, Dawn Ressel, George Siemens, Mitchell Weisburgh
What
is Facilitation?
Purpose of Facilitation
Means of Facilitation
Facilitation as Conversation
Online vs. Classroom Facilitation
Online Facilitation Tools
Role and Function of Facilitators
Facilitation Techniques
Conclusion
Introduction
Lecturing, as a means
of teaching, has significant limitations. Essentially, the model of lecturing
is in conflict with current views of effective learning and with profiles
of what today's learner needs/wants. At the root of the lecture model
lies the notion that knowledge resides in the head of the teacher, and
the student learns this knowledge by listening to the teacher. Obviously,
learning (while often including lecture) is much more...learners learn
best when given control of the experience, under the guidance and direction
of a skilled instructor.
What
then is the alternative to lecturing? Facilitation is the "lecture-replacement"
process many online and classroom instructors use to foster learning.
This process empowers learners by placing them at the center of the learning
experience...allowing them to personalize their learning based on needs
and motivations. An excellent overview of changing roles in computer mediated
learning is provided at: Changing
Roles
What
is Facilitation?
Facilitation,
in classroom or online, is a process of enabling groups/people to work
together to achieve goals/objectives. The following is a list of definitions:
-
Facilitation is the process of enabling groups to work cooperatively
and effectively (Info
Design)
-
Facilitate comes from a word which means "to make easy". In
the context of group work, facilitation is the process wherein a skilled
impartial party supports a group to identify and solve problems by improving
group members' ability to work together effectively. The facilitator
is called upon to help a group improve its performance in relation to
a particular task or project. The facilitator, like a mediator, is substantively
impartial and has no decision-making power (DRC.html)
-
Quite simply, a facilitator's job is to make it easier for the group
to do its work. By providing non-directive leadership, the facilitator
helps the group arrive at the decisions that are its task. The role
is one of assistance and guidance, not control (WG
Hill)
-
Facilitation is about engendering an open discussion on a specific set
of criteria, where the participants are taken through a series of discussions
and activities, to ultimately establish a direction (Talkforce)
-
A facilitator is a neutral person who helps a group focus its energies
on its task so that the group can make effective decisions and promote
cooperation among its members. The facilitator remains neutral and does
not contribute her/his own ideas or evaluate group members' ideas. S/he
ensures that everyone participates; protects group members, if necessary;
and builds trust. The facilitator works with the group to design the
meeting agenda and format to produce the desired results, while minimizing
disruption and frustration. (Confluence
Center)
Purpose
of Facilitation:
Facilitation can achieve
a variety of purposes, most notably:
-
Impart new material
-- this would be analogous to the lecture. The instructor either knows
something or knows where to find something that the students need to
know. It might take explaining or it might only take listing.
- Making
assignments
-- giving the students work to do, either in groups or on their own,
either project based, reading/research, or test/quiz.
- Answer
questions
-- questions might be directly about the material, might be about the
medium being used, or be related to the material but slightly tangential.
Sometimes questions can be anticipated and put in some FAQ or archive
area.
- Interact
with students
-- sometimes interaction could be its own and only reward, like virtue.
- Critique
work or thinking
-- looking over what the students are doing or saying. the critique
(positive or negative) might be directed solely at a particular student
or group or be used as a learning exercise for the entire class.
- Moderate
and/or enable discussion
(this is the role of most list-serv moderators)
- Introducing
or enabling transactions
(the 'Cardinal
Richelieu' model. He rebuilt the Sorbonne in Paris, supported promising
writers and founded the French Academy. Many French historians consider
Richelieu as the founder of French unity, as well as the person who
released France from its medieval nature.")
- Arbitrating
or mediating disputes
- Summarization
Means
of Facilitation:
The boundaries of facilitation have
been expanded with the development of Internet/technology/collaboration
tools. Prior to the proliferation of tools, facilitation was typically
conducted face-to-face in classrooms environments. The following lists
facilitation means available today:
- Static text or
graphics
- Threaded or unthreaded
discussion board
- IM or chat (possibly
archived for asynchronous learners, probably according to some type
of schedule)
- Live voice or
video, possibly with some white boarding.
- Links to other
materials or lists of materials
- Email
- Drop box (a place
for people to leave assignments, which could be open to all or just
to the person who left it and the instructor).
- Non-virtual (office
hours, phone support)
Facilitation
as Conversation
The tacit nature of learning requires a
model that permits serendipitous learning and allows for adjustment based
on learner needs revealed during the process of facilitation. In this
sense, conversation can be viewed as a process of facilitating by allowing
adjustment of pace, content, presentation, and clarification.
The
following articles explore conversational facilitation:
Good
Online Conversation lists these implications in web conversations:
- Have a clear goal
- State your intent
- Publish and follow
guidelines
- Communicate using
a cycle of request/respond/reply
- Respect multiple
perspectives
- Articulate thought
processes
- Co-construct meaning
Thought
Horizon provides a good list of various conversation Types:
- Conversations
for stories and assessments
- Conversations
for clarity
- Conversations
for co-ordination of action
- Conversations
for speculation or possible action
- Conversations
for possible conversations
- Conversations
for relationship
- Conversations
for appreciation / complaint
- Conversations
for second order learning
Online
vs. Classroom Facilitation
Are there any differences between online
and classroom facilitation? Nancy White offers the following differences:
- No physical clues
- Asynchronous
- Anonymous/disembodied
- Text-based
- Permanent record
Tools
Many software tools are available to enhance the ability for learners
to communicate online. These tools can be used to develop, deploy, or
directly facilitate interaction. The following table lists some tools
that may be of interest to online facilitators:
Tool |
Use |
| Yahoo!
Groups |
Popular community/group
service - email based |
| ezboard |
Customized/personalized
online communities |
| Zoomerang |
Create surveys
& solicit feedback |
| Qarbon |
Build online
demonstration |
| Half-Baked
Software |
Software for
simulations/self-testing |
| PalTalk |
Multi-media
-video, chat, voice over IP |
| Profiler |
Cooperation/collaboration
around specific topic |
| QuickTopic |
Discussion board |
| CommunityZero |
Community software
- multi-featured |
| MimerDesk |
Groupware -
collaborative learning, community |
| Groove |
Peer-to-peer
collaborative software - feature-rich |
For more information
on tools, see: Software,
instant messaging
Roles
and Functions of Facilitators
A
facilitator plays many different roles beyond simply guiding students.
The following links detail some of the more critical functions of facilitators:
Morten
Flate Paulsen describes teaching (facilitating) as comprising of four
categories:
- Organizational
(set agenda/pace)
- Social (create
an environment for learning)
- Intellectual
(focus on critical points)
- Assessment
Ed
Hootstein - uses four categories as well
- Instructor (Consultant,
guide, resource provider)
- Social director
(creator of collaborative environments)
- Program manager
(director of agenda)
- Technical assistant
(model of proficiency)
Zane
L. Berge - also four categories
- Pedagogical (intellectual,
task)
- Social (creating
an environment for successful learning)
- Managerial (organizational,
procedural, administrative)
- Technical (make
students feel comfortable with the system)
Facilitation
Techniques
What
is Online Facilitation provides the following facilitation techniques/guidelines:
- Assume
good intent. Remind others of this simple trick.
- Role
model the behavior you wish others to use.
- Practice
and encourage the practice of active listening/reading.
- Be
as explicit as possible in your communication.
- Don't
automatically assume understanding -- ask for clarification as needed.
- Build
trust by doing what you say you will do. Encourage others to do the
same.
- Trust
is sometimes surprisingly quickly granted, but more easily taken away.
Encourage an environment that values trust.
- Use
irony and humor with care as it does not always come across online as
you might have intended. You can always use emoticons to clarify! ;-)
- Think
before you hit the button and a post goes up.
- Be
self-aware.
- Approach
every contribution with curiosity, expecting surprise and wonder
Additional
facilitation techniques (relating to organization, social, intellectual
and assessment functions) can be found at CMC
Teachers and Their Functions.
One of the roles
that a facilitator/instructor plays is the person in charge, which means
influencing the students/others in the class. A
person can influence others through some combination of five different
forces:
- Expertise
-- sometimes you can influence others because they think you know more
than they do, they trust that your knowledge or skill will help them.
- Friendship
-- sometimes you can influence others because they like you and/or you
have a good rapport with them.
- Authority
-- sometimes they grant you authority, because of your position or seniority.
In the armed forces, you salute the uniform.
- Punishment
-- sometimes it's because they know that you can do something to harm
them (bad grades, poor recommendation, firing, etc.)
- Reward
-- and sometimes it's because you can do something to reward them (pat
on the back, publicity, money, good grades, etc.)
It's not that any
of these are definitively right or wrong, the most effective people are
usually the ones who can employ any of these at different times, when
it is most appropriate (also known as the law of requisite variety).
Conclusion
Final thoughts on facilitation from participants:
"I find in facilitation
(both in classrooms and online, but much more so online) that the most
difficult thing to get students to do is to really be willing to listen
to the views of co-students rather than almost always relying on me. I
wonder to what extent my own resistance to doing that influences my ability
to encourage students to do it and to what extent I intervene and answer
things so quickly that there is little need to rely on each other"
"I think on-line
facilitation lends itself to student empowerment more than the traditional
classroom. It's easier to "be invisible" and let the students
create and affirm their own knowledge."
"All of our
instructors have commented that they get much more depth in students'
comments via the discussion board (vs. their traditional section of students)."
"I’ve
had many students comment that they felt they had a chance to reflect
and think before responding which they weren’t as able to do in
classroom discussions. I also agree that my sense is that I get into much
depth with more of my online students then I was able to with campus classroom
students."
"Our biggest
problem is knowing how much "teaching" the facilitator is responsible
for. We have course lectures on video that presumably deliver the content,
but sometimes the facilitator "teaches" rather than "facilitates."
And to complicate matters, we compensated facilitators differently than
we did teachers (ie adjuncts or faculty). We've rectified the differential
in pay, but we still have some facilitators who think they are the sole
repository of knowledge. For some, it's a cultural issue that we may never
overcome, we just filter them out of the on-line sections."
|
|
|